This
paper critically reviews the World
Bank's treatment analysis
of the East Asian miracle. The Bank
considers the Northeast Asian experience
so extraordinary that other developing
countries should not try to emulate
Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, especially
its industrial policy. Rather, the
Bank claims that Southeast Asia
achieved its miracle by liberalizing
its economies from the mid-1980s.
Instead, this paper argues that
the Bank's portrayal of Southeast
Asia is misleading, that Southeast
Asia's achievement is considerably
more modest than Northeast Asia's,
and that economic liberalization
has often undermined the state capacities
and capabilities necessary for developmental
states.
The paper then goes on to critically
review the evidence on the adverse
consequences of economic liberalization
in Sub Saharan Africa, very often
due to conditionalities associated
with structural adjustment programs
of the World Bank and other international
financial institutions. It argues
that it will be crucial to enhance
state capacities and capabilities
for Sub Saharan Africa to achieve
more rapid economic growth and development.
|